Academic Press - Adaptive Testing Technologies

The test-retest reliability of the CAT-MH^TM is higher (r=0.92) than traditional fixed-length tests such as the PHQ-9, despite the fact that it asks different items upon repeat testing.

We’ve provided some of our Academic Press below. You can click on any one of the links to view the document and download the pdf.

Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health in Primary Care - 2019

An Inflammatory Profile Linked to Increased Suicide Risk - 2019

High-Frequency Measurement of Depressive Severity in a Patient Treated for Severe Treatment-Resistant Depression with Deep Brain Stimulation - 2017

The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry: Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test Suicide Scale - The CAT-SS - 2017

Archives of Women’s Mental Health: The Experience of Depression, Anxiety, and Mania among Perinatal Women - 2016

Psychiatric Services: Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Adaptive Depression Screener - 2016

University of Chicago Emergency Department Study Abstract: Screening for Depression in Emergency Department Patients and Relatinship to Health Care Utilization - 2016

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology: Computerized Adaptive Diagnosis and Testing of Mental Health Disorders - 2015

Psychiatric Services: Validation of Computerized Adaptive Testing in an Outpatient Nonacademic Setting - 2015

American Journal of Psychiatry: Computer Aids for the Diagnosis of Anxiety and Depression - 2014

American Journal of Psychiatry: Development of the CAT-ANX: A Computerized Adaptive Test for Anxiety - 2014

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry: The Computerized Adaptive Diagnostic Test for Major Depressive Disorder (CAD-MDD): A Screening Tool for Depression - 2013

Archives of General Psychiatry: Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Depression - 2012

Because the CAT-MH^TM adapts to the changing severity of the underlying illness, the same questions are not asked upon repeat testing. This permits high frequency mental health measurement without response bias produced by repeated administration of the same set of items.

The test-retest reliability of the CAT-MHTM is higher (r=0.92) than traditional fixed-length tests such as the PHQ-9, despite the fact that it asks different items upon repeat testing.

Interested in learning more?

The test-retest reliability of the CAT-MH^TM is higher (r=0.92) than traditional fixed-length tests such as the PHQ-9, despite the fact that it asks different items upon repeat testing.